Error: API requests are being delayed for this account. New posts will not be retrieved.
There may be an issue with the Instagram access token that you are using. Your server might also be unable to connect to Instagram at this time.
Error: API requests are being delayed for this account. New posts will not be retrieved.
There may be an issue with the Instagram access token that you are using. Your server might also be unable to connect to Instagram at this time.
Error: API requests are being delayed for this account. New posts will not be retrieved.
There may be an issue with the Instagram access token that you are using. Your server might also be unable to connect to Instagram at this time.
Guillermo Fernández Abascal
Every other day we read that more than half of the world’s population lives in cities. Highly densified urban environments occupy our imaginations, but in reality, most people live in the suburbs. This phenomena is amplified in Australia. In fact Sydney is pure suburbia; it is all we’ve got.
The temples of the periphery articulate a new post-anthropocenic civic strategy; they produce urbanity as well as absorb it from their immediate context. They attempt to organize the outer context’s overabundance of information in a crystalized architectural form. As a consequence, it is not always about beauty. Yet, at the same time, it is only about beauty – and sometimes even about the possibility of a contemporary monumentality.
These infrastructural systems preserve the facade from the influence of the interior layout and avoid a strictly functionalist approach. The design of the facade is a major concern – something that will occupy an important part of the semester – involving all our technical skills and the best part of our imagination.
Both ambiguous and overambitious, the traditional architect’s repertoire is no longer able to provide the means to negotiate the multiple fields that coalesce in infrastructure. A new set of tools is required to straddle science and culture and mediate technical and social aspects of infrastructure. The studio proposals are defined by robust political agendas, strong territorial gestures, convincing contextual approaches, majestic formal strategies, sophisticated appropriations of architectural precedents, obstinate spatial tactics, simple organizational schemes, clear structural systems and banal technical details. The architecture of infrastructure scrutinizes the performative role, financial logic, ecological repercussions, civic value and aesthetic impacts of the temples of today.
During the semester, the third year cohort investigated nine peripheral areas of greater Sydney: Kurnell, Wetherill Park, Bella Vista, Richmond, Penrith, Prestons, Warragmaba, Campbeltown and Luddenham. Nine haphazardly assembled suburbs where residential areas, industrial parks, rural settlements, natural reserves and infrastructural facilities all meet to form an incoherent and difficult whole. In each of them, students inserted a new piece of public infrastructure: a waste management facility, a transport depot, a data centre, a water treatment plant, a power station, an art storage, a greenhouse for industrialised agriculture, a distribution warehouse and a hangar.